As Americans increasingly reject promotions that compromise work-life balance, experts warn of potential career repercussions. Open communication is essential.
Washington DC, United States Aug 27, 2026 ALN: Americans are souring on promotionsâespecially those that threaten their work-life balance or other nonwork priorities. But saying no to advancement could move their career in the opposite direction.
According to a recent survey by emotional insight platform Hint App, 59% of Americans would reject a promotion that required them to be available after hours, and 62% would decline moving into management at the expense of work-life boundaries, even if it came with better pay.
Thatâs especially true among younger Americans, according to a 2024 survey by recruitment firm Robert Walters. In that study, 57% of Gen Z professionals surveyed had no interest in middle management, with 67% saying the promotion seemed more stressful than rewarding.
However, saying no to an advancement offer could have some negative career repercussions, especially if your manager stuck their neck out on your behalf.
âManagers can take on a bit of a campaign for people without the individual knowing, and it may require some careful communication to avoid damaging that relationship, because it could be embarrassing for the manager if they decline,â explains Robert Walters North America CEO Chris Eldridge.
He says that without proper communication, managers could take that decision personally, noting that they could easily assume âYouâre turning down the promotion. Therefore, youâre turning down me, and you donât want anything to do with this company anymore. You can see how it can blow up very quickly.â
Turning down a promotion without stirring any negative feelings, according to Eldridge, requires open and honest conversations between managers and their team members.
âClear communication of why youâll be declining the opportunity can lead to positive outcomes,â he says. âIt helps encourage managers and leaders to reconsider whether their expectations are reasonable or aligned to where they need to be, because thereâs likely a perception that the promotion comes with longer hours.â
Eldridge encourages workers who have been offered a promotion theyâre not sure they want to request some more information and some time to consider their options. He explains that promotions are typically offered to top performers, and that those who have been singled out likely have a certain degree of leverage.
Opening up a dialogue about the decision could also help counter some misconceptions about what the role might entail.
âIâve seen people turn down promotions on the assumption of what it will mean,â Eldridge says. âIn reality, if theyâd taken the opportunity to discuss it, theyâd be amazed by what people are willing to review or change to support that person and to help create a healthy working structure for them.â
Turning down a promotion without taking a career hit can be challenging, but even getting to that uncomfortable conversation could suggest deeper issues.
In an ideal situation, workers arenât offered promotions they donât want, because their manager is already aware of their career goals and aspirations, suggests Matt Berndt, the head career strategist for Indeedâs Job Search Academy.
âYou want your employer to have an understanding of where you want to go in your career, and it ought to be an ongoing conversation at every performance review,â he says. âThatâs your opportunity to share the accomplishments that you want your boss to be aware of, and to voice the kind of training and development that you want, and the direction you want your career to take.â
Berndt contends that itâs the employeeâs responsibility to figure out the direction theyâd like their career to take, and the managerâs responsibility to understand those career preferences before putting someone forward for advancement.
He also acknowledges that both are easier said than done.
âWe all have so many things going on, and managing our own career is not something thatâs part of our job description. And itâs not something that we are typically taught in school,â he says. âWe put our heads down, we do our work, our managers are doing their work, theyâre giving as much attention to their team members as they can. So more often than not [the miscommunication is] not happening intentionally.â
Making the time for such conversations, Berndt says, helps both parties align on the individualâs long-term goals, and ensures nobody is left explaining why they donât want an opportunity after itâs been offered.
âWithout all that backstory, you turn down that promotion and now you appear ungrateful because your boss invested in you, and you can see where that leads,â he says. âHow you turn it down can be career advancing, career maintaining, or career limiting.â
Managers who donât understand why their report turned down a promotion may shy away from offering them opportunities in the future, or worse.
While there are jurisdictions and employee contract terms that allow managers to fire staff for any reason at will, Berndt says that outcome is unlikely.
The more plausible scenario that could turn a declined promotion into a termination occurs when a company is reorganizing, or moving locations, or gets acquired, and the new role becomes the only one thatâs available to them.
âItâs a very realistic scenario,â Berndt says. âSomeone could say, âWe really appreciate you. We want to keep you around, but weâre reorganizing your team. We need you to lead this team, and if you donât want this job, there really isnât a place for you here.ââ
Declined promotions arenât just a delicate topic for employees. Employers also stand to lose when staff feel negatively toward leadership opportunities, or feel pressured into taking on roles theyâre not prepared for.
âMaybe the most substantial deteriorating factor for organizations is putting people into managerial positions because of tenure and success as an individual contributor,â says Jim Harter, Gallupâs chief scientist for workplace management and well-being. âYou can see why that would happen. But itâs been one of the most systemic problems affecting organizational culture and the leadershipâs ability to get things done long term, because people arenât in the right role.â
Harter argues that organizations have more to lose from failing to offer workers the opportunity to continue advancing without taking on managerial responsibilities, often referred to as âdual track promotion.â
According to a recent Gallup study, organizations fail to choose the candidate with the necessary skills for leadership 82% of the time, with most selected because of their performance as an individual contributor rather than their leadership potential. âThe norm has been for companies to promote based on success as an individual contributor and tenure,â Harter says. âThose seem equitable on the surface, but in reality, not everybody fits the role. So youâre pushing people into roles that theyâre not naturally good at.â
Putting the wrong person into leadership can cost organizations in multiple ways: Not only does it make it harder for their team to reach its full potential, but the former rockstar employee turned manager is no longer able to do their best work. âOne of the most important things in building a successful culture is figuring out who should be the managers,â Harter says. âTheyâre going to dictate the culture. If theyâre not in a role that fits them, theyâll get frustrated and leave.â
To learn more about the latest developments in Corporate & Industry Insights, stay updated with our exclusive reports and analyses on AILensNews.
As formal authority wanes in organizations, leaders must master indirect influenâŚ
Nvidia forecasts strong third quarter revenue, exceeding analyst expectations siâŚ
Salesforce has raised its fiscal 2027 revenue and earnings forecasts, reflectingâŚ
The FSSAI is intensifying scrutiny on food labeling, compelling companies to proâŚ
Zerodha's profit growth has stalled as its core broking business struggles. ThisâŚ