Assam CM Promotes Local Tourism Amid Tensions with Meghalaya

Itanagar, India Aug 27, 2026 ALN: Amid escalating tensions between Assam and Meghalaya, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has proposed the development of local tourist destinations as alternatives to Shillong. He highlighted Umrangso, Diphu, and Haflong as scenic spots that could attract tourists and bolster Assam's tourism economy.

Sarma addressed the media in New Delhi on Wednesday, emphasizing that Assam is home to numerous picturesque locations that can be developed to enhance tourism and create job opportunities within the sector. This initiative appears to be part of a broader strategy to not only promote economic growth through tourism but also to foster a sense of unity and shared cultural heritage among the residents of Assam and Meghalaya.

“Shillong was our capital once, and our people love to visit Shillong. I feel that gradually, for tourists, Diphu, Haflong, and Umrangso are very beautiful places. We need to develop these areas,” he stated, encouraging stakeholders in the tourism industry to promote Assam’s attractions. This sentiment underscores the historical ties between the two states, as Shillong served as the capital of Assam until 1972, when Meghalaya was carved out as a separate state. The nostalgia associated with Shillong is palpable among many Assamese, which may explain the continued interest in visiting the area despite the current tensions.

Additionally, Sarma mentioned that discussions had taken place in New Delhi regarding the proposed airports at Umrangso and Majuli. He expressed optimism that these airports would be completed under his administration, allowing Umrangso to compete with Shillong in terms of tourism. The establishment of these airports is significant as it would not only facilitate easier access to these regions but also potentially enhance the economic landscape of Assam by attracting more tourists and investors. Improved infrastructure is often seen as a key driver of tourism, and the proposed developments could play a crucial role in transforming Assam's tourism sector.

These comments come in the wake of heightened tensions between the two states, following incidents involving Assam-registered vehicles and protests in Meghalaya. Both governments had previously agreed on measures to ensure the safe movement of people and vehicles across state lines. However, the underlying issues that contribute to these tensions are complex and multifaceted, rooted in historical grievances, cultural differences, and competition for resources. The recent incidents have highlighted the need for ongoing dialogue and cooperation between the two states to address these challenges effectively.

Addressing the tensions, Sarma noted that some individuals in Meghalaya were opposed to visitors from Assam. “I spoke to Chief Minister Conrad Sangma, and we assigned Minister Atul Bora to address the incident. Now the problem has been resolved. However, we must acknowledge that some people in Meghalaya do not welcome tourists from Assam,” he remarked. This acknowledgment of differing perspectives is crucial, as it reflects the realities of inter-state relations in the region. While there are certainly individuals who harbor animosity towards Assamese tourists, there are also many who recognize the benefits of tourism and the economic opportunities it brings.

He also referenced journalist and columnist Patricia Mukhim in the context of this issue, stating, “Intellectuals like Patricia Mukhim, whom people from Assam respect, write against Assam tourists, which incites animosity.” Mukhim, a prominent voice in Meghalaya, has been vocal about the challenges posed by tourism and the need for responsible travel practices. Her critiques highlight a growing concern among some sections of Meghalaya's population regarding the impact of tourism on local culture, resources, and infrastructure. This discourse is essential as it brings to light the need for a balanced approach to tourism that respects local sentiments while promoting economic growth.

Despite the tensions, Sarma acknowledged that there are also many in Meghalaya who are welcoming towards visitors from Assam. “So regarding this, I think there are two types of people in Meghalaya - one like Mukhim and, on the other hand, people who love Assam. So there is a contradiction, which is why sometimes tensions erupt,” he concluded. This recognition of the diversity of opinions within Meghalaya serves as a reminder that the relationship between Assam and Meghalaya is not monolithic; rather, it is characterized by a spectrum of views that can lead to both collaboration and conflict.

The implications of Sarma's proposal to promote local tourism are significant. By highlighting alternative destinations within Assam, the Chief Minister aims to reduce the dependency on Shillong while fostering regional pride. This strategy could also help mitigate some of the tensions by encouraging more positive interactions between the two states. As local tourism develops, it may provide opportunities for cultural exchange and understanding, which are essential for building lasting peace and cooperation in the region.

In conclusion, while the tensions between Assam and Meghalaya present challenges, they also offer opportunities for dialogue and development. The promotion of local tourism could serve as a bridge to foster better relations and mutual respect between the two states. As both governments navigate these complexities, the focus on enhancing tourism infrastructure and promoting lesser-known destinations may play a pivotal role in shaping the future of inter-state relations in Northeast India.