Iran's Mohsen Rezaei declares that countries participating in the US economic war against Iran will be deemed enemies, threatening to strike their interests.
New Delhi, India Aug 23, 2026 ALN: Iran's top security official, Mohsen Rezaei, issued a stern warning that any nation participating in the US economic war against Iran will be classified as an "enemy" by Tehran. This statement was made during an interview with state-run IRIB TV on Saturday.
Rezaei, who serves as the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, emphasized that Iran would initially seek negotiations with such countries, urging them to refrain from joining the conflict. However, he warned that if they refuse, Tehran would retaliate against their interests. He specifically noted that if neighboring countries choose to align with the US siege, Iran would ensure that "not even a single drop of oil" is exported from the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz is a vital maritime corridor through which approximately 20% of the world's oil passes. Its significance cannot be overstated, as it serves as a critical chokepoint for global energy supplies. Iran's control over this strait gives it considerable leverage in the region, and any threat to its accessibility can have far-reaching implications for global oil prices and energy security.
In his remarks, Rezaei highlighted Iran's experience in circumventing US sanctions, stating that the country has developed methods to continue its oil sales despite external pressures, as reported by Xinhua news agency. This assertion reflects Iran's longstanding efforts to adapt to the sanctions regime, which has included seeking alternative markets for its oil, utilizing clandestine shipping methods, and engaging in barter trade to bypass financial restrictions.
Additionally, Rezaei reiterated that the Hormuz Strait would remain closed unless the United States fulfills its obligations under the Iran-US peace memorandum of understanding signed in June. He insisted that Washington must take the first step in this regard. This demand underscores the fragility of diplomatic relations between Iran and the US, particularly in light of the recent history of negotiations that have often ended in stalemate.
Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi also weighed in on the situation, asserting that the US's anti-Iran economic operations are destined to fail, just like previous coercive measures. He referenced past failures of US sanctions, stating, "14 years ago: 'Most crippling sanctions in history.' Failed. 8 years ago: 'Maximum pressure.' Failed. 5 months ago: 'Unconditional surrender.' Failed. Today: 'Most crushing economic operation ever.' Bound to fail," in a post on social media platform X. This rhetoric reflects a broader narrative within Iranian leadership that views US sanctions as both ineffective and counterproductive, arguing that they have historically strengthened national resolve rather than weakened it.
This warning from Iranian officials follows US President Donald Trump's announcement of what he termed "the most crushing economic operation ever taken" against any country that provides support to Iran. Trump characterized this initiative as an "economic warfare and isolation on an unprecedented scale," declaring it an "ECONOMIC D-DAY" on his Truth Social platform. This declaration signifies a shift in US policy towards a more aggressive stance, potentially escalating tensions further.
On June 18, the United States and Iran had signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) aimed at ending the regional conflict on multiple fronts, including Lebanon. The agreement stipulated that negotiations would occur within a 60-day timeframe, which has since lapsed, leaving the future of the talks uncertain amid escalating tensions between the two nations. The breakdown of these discussions raises concerns about a potential military confrontation, as both sides appear entrenched in their positions.
The implications of Iran's declaration and the US's economic strategies are profound, not only for the countries involved but also for global markets and geopolitical stability. Should Iran follow through on its threats to disrupt oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, it could provoke a military response from the US and its allies, leading to heightened conflict in the region. Furthermore, the potential for increased oil prices could have significant economic repercussions worldwide, affecting everything from fuel costs to inflation rates.
Additionally, the rhetoric from both sides highlights the deep-seated animosity and mistrust that has characterized US-Iran relations for decades. The historical context of this conflict includes the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the subsequent hostage crisis, and the ongoing disputes over Iran's nuclear program. Each of these events has contributed to a complex and often adversarial relationship, making diplomatic resolutions challenging.
As the situation continues to evolve, the international community watches closely, with many countries advocating for dialogue and negotiation as a means to de-escalate tensions. The potential for a new round of sanctions or military actions raises questions about the efficacy of such measures and the long-term strategy for addressing issues related to Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional influence.
In conclusion, Iran's warning to nations aligning with the US underscores a pivotal moment in international relations, where economic warfare intertwines with geopolitical strategies. The outcomes of these tensions will likely shape not only the future of US-Iran relations but also the broader dynamics of power in the Middle East and beyond.
To learn more about the latest developments in International Politics, stay updated with our exclusive reports and analyses on AILensNews.
