But we have to hand it to 'em on mayonnaise

London, United Kingdom Jul 11, 2026 ALN: The exploration of national identity and political stability is a theme that resonates throughout history, particularly when comparing the United States to older nations. Richard Brookhiser's work, What Would the Founders Do?: Our Questions, Their Answers, provides a compelling analysis of the United States' unique position in the global landscape, especially in relation to its European counterparts. As Brookhiser indicates in his writing, the U.S. is a relatively young nation, yet it possesses institutions that have remarkable longevity and resilience.

Brookhiser's observation that the presidency and the Supreme Court date back to 1789, while the army's roots extend even further to 1775, highlights a foundational stability that contrasts sharply with the tumultuous political histories of many European nations. For example, France, which underwent a revolution in 1789, has experienced numerous changes in government, including five republics, two empires, and various forms of monarchy and fascism. This historical context serves to illustrate the cyclical nature of political systems in older countries, where the quest for stability often leads to upheaval and change.

In contrast, the United States has managed to maintain its core institutions for over two centuries, a feat that speaks to the robustness of its constitutional framework and the foresight of its founders. The founders of the United States established a system of checks and balances designed to prevent the concentration of power and to ensure that governance would be responsive to the will of the people. This system has allowed the U.S. to adapt and evolve while maintaining a sense of continuity and identity.

Brookhiser's reference to the American ambassador to Prussia in 1797 serves as a poignant reminder of the United States' early struggles for recognition on the world stage. At a time when the nation was still defining itself, it faced the challenge of being perceived as a legitimate player among established European powers. The anecdote about the lieutenant in Berlin, who had never heard of the United States, underscores the uphill battle the young nation faced in asserting its place in international affairs.

Moreover, the comparison to other nations like Russia, Spain, Italy, and Greece further emphasizes the notion that while these countries may possess rich histories and cultural legacies, their political systems have often been marked by instability. The frequent changes in government and the rise and fall of empires can create a sense of uncertainty that contrasts starkly with the relative steadiness of American governance.

This historical perspective invites a broader discussion about the implications of political stability and governance. The United States, with its enduring institutions, has been able to foster a sense of national identity that is often grounded in the principles of democracy and individual rights. This foundation has allowed the country to navigate challenges and crises, from civil wars to global conflicts, while maintaining its core democratic values.

However, the question remains: does this stability come at a cost? The United States has faced its share of criticism for its approach to governance, particularly when compared to the more progressive policies and social safety nets seen in some European nations. Critics argue that the U.S. can be slow to adapt to changing social and economic needs, often lagging behind countries that have more flexible political systems.

For instance, many European countries have implemented comprehensive healthcare systems and robust social welfare programs that reflect a commitment to the well-being of their citizens. In contrast, the American healthcare system has been characterized by debates over access, affordability, and quality, highlighting the challenges of a system that prioritizes free-market principles. The complexities surrounding healthcare in the U.S. reveal a tension between individual liberties and collective responsibilities, raising questions about how best to achieve a balance that serves the population effectively.

Furthermore, the notion of American exceptionalism, which suggests that the U.S. holds a unique place in the world due to its democratic ideals and historical trajectory, can sometimes lead to a dismissive attitude toward the successes of other nations. Brookhiser's lighthearted jab at the French with respect to mayonnaise serves as a humorous illustration of this sentiment, suggesting that while Americans may critique European political systems, they can still appreciate certain cultural contributions. This interplay between national pride and cultural appreciation reflects a broader dynamic in which nations grapple with their identities and relationships on the global stage.

Ultimately, the dialogue surrounding governance, national identity, and the role of history in shaping contemporary society is complex and multifaceted. Brookhiser's insights encourage readers to reflect on the lessons learned from both American and European experiences, recognizing that while the U.S. has its own unique strengths, there is also much to be learned from the successes and failures of other nations. The ability to engage in constructive dialogue about governance practices can foster a greater understanding of what constitutes effective leadership and responsive governance.

In conclusion, as we continue to navigate the challenges of modern governance, it is essential to consider the historical context that shapes our understanding of political stability and identity. The United States' ability to maintain its foundational institutions while adapting to the evolving needs of its citizens is a testament to the vision of its founders. At the same time, acknowledging the experiences of older nations can provide valuable lessons in resilience, adaptability, and the pursuit of a more perfect union. As Brookhiser aptly points out, while we may have our differences, there are shared experiences that bind us together in the ongoing journey of governance and societal progress.

This ongoing exploration of governance and identity is not just an academic exercise; it has real-world implications for how nations interact with one another. The lessons gleaned from historical patterns can inform contemporary policy decisions, international relations, and even cultural exchanges. Understanding the political trajectories of other nations can help the United States navigate its role in a rapidly changing world, where collaboration and mutual respect are becoming increasingly vital.

As the United States continues to evolve, it faces the challenge of reconciling its foundational principles with the realities of a diverse and interconnected global society. The ongoing debates about immigration, social justice, and economic inequality reflect the complexities of a nation striving to live up to its ideals while addressing the needs of all its citizens. In this context, the insights of thinkers like Brookhiser become invaluable, providing a framework for understanding the past and envisioning a future that honors both tradition and progress.

In summary, the examination of national identity and political stability is not merely a reflection on the past but a crucial element in shaping the future. The resilience of American institutions, the lessons from European political histories, and the ongoing dialogue about governance all contribute to a richer understanding of what it means to be a nation in the modern world. As we reflect on these themes, we are reminded that the journey of governance is an ongoing process, one that requires vigilance, adaptability, and a commitment to the principles that underpin our societies.