Government Orders Immediate Removal of Illegal Structures on National Highways

Kohima, India Jul 30, 2026 ALN: Kohima: The government has directed the immediate removal of all unauthorized structures within the Right of Way (RoW) of National Highways across the state, in compliance with Supreme Court orders aimed at improving highway safety. This directive is part of a broader initiative to ensure that national highways remain safe and accessible for all users, including motorists, pedestrians, and commercial vehicles. The enforcement of this order is expected to have far-reaching implications, not just for highway safety but also for the local economy and community relations.

The Right of Way (RoW) is a critical concept in highway management, referring to the land on which the highway is built, including the area necessary for its operation and maintenance. Structures such as eateries, shops, and other commercial establishments within this area can pose significant risks, including obstructing visibility, causing traffic congestion, and increasing the likelihood of accidents. The government's decision to enforce the removal of these structures underscores the need for a safer travel environment, reflecting a growing concern about the safety of highway users.

In a notification, the Department of Works and Housing (Works Branch) stated that the construction or operation of any new dhaba, eatery, or commercial structure within the RoW of any National Highway is prohibited with immediate effect. This prohibition is not merely a regulatory measure; it is a response to growing concerns regarding the safety hazards posed by unauthorized structures. By eliminating these risks, the government aims to enhance the overall safety of national highways, which are vital arteries for transportation and commerce in the state.

The directive follows the Supreme Court’s orders dated April 13 and July 13, 2026, in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9 of 2025 relating to the Phalodi accident vs National Highways Authority of India and Others. This case brought to light the dangers associated with unauthorized structures along highways, particularly in instances where such structures contributed to traffic accidents. The Supreme Court's involvement highlights the judiciary's role in enforcing safety regulations and ensuring that government bodies adhere to established laws aimed at protecting public safety. It also emphasizes the judiciary's commitment to holding authorities accountable for maintaining safety standards on national highways.

The department has directed all Deputy Commissioners to strictly enforce the demolition and removal of both new and existing unauthorized structures located within the Right of Way of National Highways, in accordance with the apex court’s directions. This enforcement is expected to be a collaborative effort involving local government officials, law enforcement agencies, and public works departments. The involvement of multiple stakeholders is crucial to ensure that the removal process is conducted efficiently and without unnecessary disruption to highway users. Coordination among these entities will be essential in addressing potential challenges that may arise during the enforcement process.

The notification stated that the enforcement process must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act (CNH Act) and the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) issued on August 7, 2025. The CNH Act provides a framework for the regulation of land use and traffic management along national highways, while the SOP outlines specific procedures that must be followed during the removal of unauthorized structures. This structured approach is intended to minimize confusion and ensure that all actions taken are legally sound and justified, thereby reducing the likelihood of legal challenges from affected parties.

One of the implications of this directive is the potential economic impact on local businesses that operate near national highways. Many small eateries and shops have established themselves along these routes, catering to travelers and truck drivers. The immediate removal of these structures could lead to significant financial losses for these businesses, prompting concerns about unemployment and economic displacement in the affected areas. As the government moves forward with these removals, it may need to consider providing support or alternative solutions for those displaced by this initiative. This could include financial assistance, relocation options, or support for transitioning to new business models that comply with the new regulations.

Moreover, the enforcement of this directive may also lead to public backlash from local communities that rely on these establishments for their livelihoods. It is essential for the government to engage with affected stakeholders, including local business owners and residents, to communicate the reasons behind this policy and explore potential compensatory measures or alternative economic opportunities. Such engagement can facilitate a smoother transition and help mitigate negative sentiments towards the government’s actions. Community forums, public meetings, and outreach programs could serve as platforms for dialogue and understanding between the government and the local populace.

From a broader perspective, the government's action reflects a growing recognition of the need for infrastructure management that prioritizes safety and compliance with legal standards. As urbanization and traffic volumes increase, the challenges associated with highway safety become more pronounced. By taking decisive action against unauthorized structures, the government is setting a precedent for future infrastructure policies that prioritize public safety over short-term economic gains. This approach may also encourage other regions to adopt similar measures, fostering a culture of compliance and safety in highway management across the country.

In conclusion, the government's directive to remove unauthorized structures within the Right of Way of National Highways is a significant step towards enhancing highway safety in the state. While this initiative is rooted in legal compliance and safety considerations, it also raises important questions about the economic implications for local businesses and the need for community engagement. As the enforcement process unfolds, it will be crucial for the government to balance the imperative of safety with the economic realities faced by those affected by these changes. The ongoing dialogue between government authorities and local communities will be essential in navigating the complexities of this issue and ensuring that the ultimate goal of safer highways is achieved without undue hardship on local populations. Ensuring that the enforcement process is sensitive to the needs of the community will be key in maintaining public trust and support for government initiatives aimed at improving infrastructure and safety.