Governor Calls PSC Secretary Amid Exam Scam Investigation

Thiruvananthapuram, India Aug 22, 2026 ALN: Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar has taken a proactive step in addressing the growing concerns surrounding the integrity of examinations conducted by the Public Service Commission (PSC). On Friday, August 21, 2026, he summoned Saju George, the Secretary of the PSC, for a brief meeting that lasted approximately 15 minutes. This meeting is part of the ongoing investigation into alleged irregularities that have emerged in the examination process, which has raised serious questions about the credibility of the PSC and its operations.

The PSC plays a crucial role in the recruitment process for various government positions, ensuring that candidates are evaluated fairly and transparently. However, recent allegations suggest that there may have been significant anomalies in the evaluation process, which could undermine public trust in the commission. The allegations have prompted the establishment of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) from the Crime Branch that is currently probing these claims of malpractices. The investigation aims to determine the extent of any irregularities and hold accountable those responsible for any misconduct.

The meeting between Governor Arlekar and Secretary George was reportedly aimed at gathering general information about the ongoing controversy and the current status of the investigation. While the details of their discussion remain confidential, it is clear that the government is taking these allegations seriously and is committed to ensuring a thorough investigation. The outcome of this inquiry could have far-reaching implications for the PSC and the broader public service recruitment framework in the region.

The PSC's reputation is critical, as it is responsible for selecting candidates for various state government positions, including administrative roles, teaching positions, and other essential services. Any perceived or actual flaws in its examination processes could lead to a loss of confidence among job seekers and the general public. The ongoing investigation, therefore, is not just about addressing specific allegations but is also about restoring faith in the integrity of the public service recruitment process.

In addition to the PSC controversy, the political landscape has been further complicated by another incident involving the state's police chief. Governor Arlekar's decision to summon State Police Chief Ravada Chandrasekhar in connection with allegations raised by Ciza Thomas, the Vice-Chancellor of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, has ignited further controversy. This incident has raised questions about the relationship between the Governor's office and the state government, particularly regarding the roles and responsibilities of various officials.

Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan has expressed the government's strong protest to the Lok Bhavan concerning the summoning of the police chief, indicating that the state administration is concerned about the implications of such actions on governance and law enforcement. The Chief Minister's response reflects a broader concern within the government about the potential overreach of the Governor's office and the need for clear communication and collaboration between state officials.

Leader of Opposition Pinarayi Vijayan has also weighed in on the matter, demanding clarification on whether the Lok Bhavan summoned the police chief without the knowledge of the Chief Minister or the Home Minister. This inquiry underscores the political tensions that can arise in such situations, particularly when the actions of one branch of government appear to encroach upon the responsibilities of another. The opposition's call for transparency highlights the need for accountability in governance and the importance of maintaining a clear separation of powers.

The examination scam investigation and the political fallout from the summoning of key officials reflect a broader context of governance challenges in the region. As public scrutiny increases, the government faces pressure to demonstrate its commitment to transparency and integrity in public service. The ongoing investigations will likely be closely monitored by the public and various stakeholders, including civil society organizations, educational institutions, and political parties.

In conclusion, the unfolding events surrounding the PSC examination scam and the political controversies involving the Governor's office highlight the complexities of governance in the region. As the SIT continues its investigation into the alleged irregularities, the implications of these developments will be significant for the PSC, the state government, and the broader public service framework. The outcomes of these inquiries will not only affect the individuals directly involved but also shape public perceptions of the integrity and effectiveness of the state's institutions.